Posts Tagged ‘Bait Money’

Fifty Years (More or Less) of Quarry

Tuesday, August 25th, 2026

Yes, I created my hitman character Quarry fifty years ago. The life he’s led since has been both violent and unexpected.

In the late ‘60s, I’d set my ambitions to be a private eye writer aside to follow the Richard Stark example and write Bait Money, in which the mono-named thief Nolan and his sidekick Jon had one criminal adventure that led somehow to a number more. Nolan was meant to be an homage to Stark (Donald E. Westlake) and his antihero Parker, a one-off; but the publisher wanted more, and Don Westlake gave his blessing, so off and running we went.

But from the start I wanted to come up with something of my own, even if it was bound to reflect the hardboiled likes of Richard Stark, Mickey Spillane, Dashiell Hammett, James M. Cain, Jim Thompson and Raymond Chandler. I’m fuzzy on whether I was, somewhere in my young psyche, wanting to write a novel that could lead to sequels.

I’ll say this: I never have believed in writing a novel consciously designed to do that. It’s too presumptuous and leads to bad decisions – I always have written one book at a time. And with Quarry (originally published under the unfortunate title The Broker) I left my hitman in an untenable position, one from which it was unlikely he might survive.

Of course he did anyway.

I’ve spoken of this before, but I wanted to get away from the Stark/Parker approach that included only other crooks getting killed – no civilians. And, in part because I already felt I had a knack for it, utilize my gift for first-person narration to write about a bad guy in his own voice. To me, much as I liked Stark’s Parker, the character and his world presented in third person gave the reader some protection.

I wanted to tear that wall down, to confront readers with just who they were identifying. Additionally, I wanted Quarry to be in many ways normal, so you could go for long stretches and not have to deal with who and what he really was. I wanted him to be good company. He was damaged goods, but in many ways was just like us.

Also, I knew I had to do something original (again, within the hardboiled spectrum) to really make my mark in my chosen field. The way Spade, Marlowe, Hammer, Bond had. And Quarry seemed just the ticket. Nobody had written that character before, not in the first person, anyway.

So some part of the young me felt I’d found the thing that would set me apart, and my mark would be made. Except…no. The four Quarry paperbacks I wrote for Berkley Books generated scant sales; yes, a few nice reviews and some fan mail, but…when the fourth book came and went, so did Quarry.

And Nathan Heller, with his historical approach and first-person narration, became how I really made at least some sort of mark in my chosen field.

Enough so that a publisher approached me about doing whatever novel I wanted to…and I took that opportunity to write a fifth Quarry, to see if I could jump-start the series. The novel was well received (Primary Target aka Quarry’s Vote) but no further novels immediately followed. A few short stories did, however, and one of them (“A Matter of Principal”) generated a short film.

From there, Quarry just kept coming. Editor Charles Ardai at Hard Case Crime, in the early days of that line, gave me the opportunity to wrap the series up with The Last Quarry. But somehow that led to The First Quarry, and now the novels number eighteen…and somehow he’s been around since 1976. Along the way there has been a movie I wrote plus a single season of a Quarry TV series.

Actually the character was created at the University of Iowa’s Writers Workshop around ‘72, but it took a while for me to finish the novel and get it sold.

In November the 50th anniversary Quarry novel will be published by Hard Case Crime: Quarry’s Reunion. Reviews have started to appear and they’ve been positive. Take a look at Publisher’s Weekly on the novel:


Trade Paperback: Bookshop Purchase Link Amazon Purchase Link Books-A-Million Purchase Link Barnes & Noble Purchase Link
E-Book: Bookshop Purchase Link
Quarry’s Reunion (Quarry #18)
Max Allan Collins. Hard Case Crime, $18.99 trade paper (224p) ISBN 978-1-83541-646-4

Aging ex–hit man Quarry is in fine form in the pulse-pounding sequel to Quarry’s Return from MWA Grand Master Collins. At 71, Quarry is trying to lead a tranquil life in Minnesota. He jumps into action when he’s approached by Jenny Means, an attractive 40-something who’s the spitting image of her mother, Mary Ann—Quarry’s high school sweetheart. Jenny, who’s recently experienced a series of strange accidents and been shot at, fears someone is out to kill her. The police have dismissed her worries, attributing the gunfire to random gang violence, but Quarry returns to his hometown of Fair View, Ohio, where Jenny lives, to investigate. He arrives just in time for his 50th high school reunion, and finds several people who might want Jenny dead. They include her half brother, Alex, who’ll benefit financially if she dies before him, and Quarry’s former classmate, Caldonia Jackson, who has a fraught history with Quarry and has become Alex’s mentor. As in other series entries, Collins complements the brisk, pulpy plot with plentiful sex scenes, resulting in a gritty adventure that lives up to series standards. Collins’s fans will be well pleased. (Nov.)

Well, I’m well-pleased, as PW can be tough, and I took a chance with this one, because it’s not a typical Quarry (if there is such a thing). I wanted to explore his past in a way I haven’t before, and I also wanted to do a traditional mystery with a noir approach – something I’ve done a few times, including with Quarry in Quarry’s Cut.

The novel will not be out till November, but I am planning to do a book giveaway in September. I’ll offer ten copies to readers willing to write Amazon reviews. Or if you have a blog and do reviews, and would like a copy, let me know at macphilms@hotmail.com. More about this later.

In the meantime, here’s a terrific write-up from writer Ron Fortier, a real pro:

QUARRY’S REUNION
By Max Allan Collins
Available 10 Nov. 2026
Hard Case Crime
217 pgs

Grand Master mystery writer Max Allan Collins has created a number of series during his long career. He’s given us professional thieves, historical private eyes, retired secret agents and a wonderful small town female sheriff among many others. All were brilliantly written, but we do have our favorites. Topping our list is the Quarry books that tell the story of a Vietnam veteran and his evolution into a contract killer. Why it remains our favorite is primarily because, like Collin’s deadly protagonist, we too are veterans of that Southeast Asian conflict and are now well past calling ourselves middle-age.

Collins allows his fictional character to age like the rest of us. With the past few entries in the series, it has been fun to watch a 70-year-old tough guy deal with new, and always dangerous situations. Never quite sure his body will respond to whatever threats he will encounter; Quarry has to rely on his experience and hard earned survival skills.

In this new story, he is summoned back to his home town of Fair View, Ohio, by his long ago high-school sweetheart, Mary Ann Kemper. After he had left home to join the US Marines, Mary Ann married Bobby Means, the son of the town’s wealthiest family. They had a beautiful daughter named Jenny. After the marriage ended in divorce, Bobby married another local girl, Suzanne Shaw, and together they had a son, Alex. Soon after, Suzanne followed Mary Ann’s history and left him. Despite the scandalous divorces, Bobby’s mother, Virginia Means, refused to abandon her grandchildren and set up a trust fund for them. When turning 50, both Jenny and Alex would receive half a million dollars.

Now, as each is nearing that particular birthday, Jenny is nearly killed in three separate incidents. The police believe them to be nothing by random events, but Mary Ann disagrees. Convinced someone is trying to kill her daughter, she reaches out to Quarry. How and why she does this would involve writing our own lengthy dissertation. Suffice it to say, our protagonist agrees to help her. All this occurs during the weekend of his 50th High School Reunion. Among his surviving classmates are several possible suspects with motives for wanting Jenny terminated.

Quarry’s Reunion is a fun read watching Collins juxtapose his mystery over the all too familiar nostalgic torture that these gatherings become. It offers us a rare glimpse into Quarry’s origins, his life and aspiration before the world turned upside down and he found himself lost in a jungle half a world away. Again, it was all too easy for this reviewer to nod time and again, as we share quite a few of the old soldiers’ memories. This Quarry is a different character, attesting to the reality that change is the only true constant. Thanks Max, for not being afraid to grow old with us.

M.A.C.

Return of the Maltese Falcon, Nate Heller & Nolan Get Some YouTube Love

Tuesday, August 4th, 2026

This week is a YouTube fest, and we begin with a fan of The Maltese Falcon taking a smart look at Return of the Maltese Falcon.

There’s something on You Tube called Private Eye July, and Mystery and Mayhem host Jim (don’t know his last name) took a look at both True Detective (and the Nathan Heller series) and Return of the Maltese Falcon.

First, on what appears to be a regular show, Jim offers Mystery and Mayhem recommendations.

Second, he offers a wrap-up of this year’s Private Eye July, including a look at Return of the Maltese Falcon.

Finally the Book Graveyard has a review of my first published book, Bait Money.

Though the Graveyard host is knowledgeable, and apparently a big fan of my work, he is unaware that the 1981 edition from Pinnacle of Bait Money is a somewhat revised reprint of the Curtis Books original that had appeared in 1973. A Nolan book preceded it, Mourn the Living, but it didn’t see publication till much later (this early work is included with Spree in the Hard Case Crime title, Mad Money).

The Book Graveyard host is obviously an enthusiast of paperback originals in the men’s adventure and Executioner-type crime vein, and I admit to being delighted for my early ‘70s self when he talks about my writing being on a whole other level than what he regularly reads.

M.A.C.

A Richard Stark Christmas

Tuesday, December 16th, 2025

I was recently asked to do an interview for a website dedicated to Donald E. Westlake’s Parker novels (written under his pseudonym Richard Stark). That website is right here: tough business: a parker site

I agreed to the interview, but warned that my answers would likely be extensive, because Westlake was the last writer I read who had greatly influenced me (the others being Hammett, Chandler, Spillane and Jim Thompson). Westlake’s Parker led to me naming my first three series characters (Nolan and Jon, Mallory and Quarry) each with a single name, in honor of the Richard Stark tradition.

Quarry grew out of the Parker novels, too, in a fashion, as the first book (The Broker, 1975, since published under my preferred title, Quarry) was a response of sorts to the Stark series, which served up its anti-hero fiction at a distance (third-person) and sticking to heists (and avoiding civilian deaths). I wanted to take it up a notch with a first-person narrator who was a professional killer.

The interview tells of my relationship to Don Westlake as a mentor, friend and fellow professional writer. He knew of the first Nolan, Bait Money, and had encouraged me and (as you’ll see below) helped me get the novel seen in the publishing world. After my parents, he was the first one to hear from me about the novel’s acceptance for publication. on Dec. 24, 1971. His response was, “Sometimes God acts like O. Henry and there’s nothing you can do about it.” The footnote is that I received published copies on Dec. 24, 1972, both Bait Money and Blood Money bearing 1973 publication dates.

That story isn’t included below, but a lot else is.


Don Westlake and me at the 1986 Bouchercon, where he was Guest of Honor, and I interviewed him.
1) How did you first discover Richard Stark’s Parker?

My then-girlfriend (and now, and always, wife) Barb and I saw Point Blank at a drive-in theater on the film’s first release. I remembered seeing a movie tie-in paperback on a spinner rack at a local supermarket, which stayed open all night…and I immediately went there, late that night, and bought it and the handful of other Parker reprints (and one new one) Gold Medal issued at the same time.

I eagerly consumed those books and sought the ones that Gold Medal hadn’t reprinted, finding all but one (The Mourner) at various used bookstores. When Barb and I honeymooned for a week in Chicago in 1968, we did (among the usual honeymoon activities) dine at terrific restaurants, go to plays, see movies, and scour sketchy used bookstores all over the city looking for The Mourner. And finding it.

Here’s an interesting, perhaps bizarre footnote: when I ran out of Richard Stark books, I decided I wanted to read something that wasn’t so dark, as a kind of palate cleanser. I picked up a paperback of The Fugitive Pigeon, a comic suspense novel by someone called Donald E. Westlake, and was hooked. I had no idea Westlake and Stark were the same writer. In my room at home (in my parents’ house), I had a shelf of honor for my two favorite writers – Stark and Westlake, separated by a slim metal bookshelf. I collected Westlake as obsessively as I did Stark.

In Anthony Boucher’s mystery-fiction column in The New York Times, I finally learned Stark and Westlake were the same writer (as well as Tucker Coe). I removed the metal book-end separating the two writers.

Don loved that story, by the way.

2) You’ve often spoken about the Nolan series being an homage to Parker. How did that come about? Did you start with the intention of writing a Parker-esque thief or did the character develop naturally?

I started writing novels in late junior high and on through high school, writing them during summer vacation and submitting them to publishers (unsuccessfully) during the school year. I did several imitation Mickey Spillane novels and one imitation Ian Fleming. In my high school years, I discovered Ennis Willie, an obscure writer of what were sold as softcore porn (but weren’t): Willie wrote crime novels about a one-named character, Sand, who had been a second-tier mob guy who betrayed his bosses in some fashion and was on the run. Sand also solved mysteries along the way, and – although the books were in third person – Willie wrote the best imitation Spillane I ever found (and I was looking). As the years passed, I became one of a handful of professional writers who loved the Sand books and extolled them and Willie, who had written prolifically for perhaps three years and disappeared. All the latter-day discussion of Sand and his author, in fanzines and such (very much pre-Internet), chiefly by myself and the late Steve Mertz, finally caught Willie’s attention. He turned out neither to be Black (as we had speculated) or dead (which we had also speculated), but had gone into his family’s printing business for the rest of his working life. In retirement, he was thrilled to learn he’d been rediscovered and published two collections of the Sand novels (Sand’s War and Sand’s Game, still available at Amazon).

Sand and Parker are similar characters, to say the least, though there’s no sign either Don or Willie ever read each other. They first appeared at about the same time – they were just swimming in the same slipstream. But I made a connection between them, and that led to my one-name character, Nolan, developed while I was still at community college, in Mourn the Living. That novel wasn’t published till the later Nolans were, and can be found as a sort of “bonus feature” in Hard Case Crime’s Mad Money (with Spree).

3) Speaking of Nolan, the addition of his surrogate son Jon both differentiates him from Parker and humanizes him in a way readers may find easier to relate to. Did you find that relationship to be something that was lacking with Parker?

The first published Nolan novel, Bait Money, was fairly overtly – and the entire series is – born out of my enthusiasm for Parker (and to a lesser degree Sand). I had already started a long (again, pre-Net) correspondence with Don. He wrote me wonderful lengthy letters, and a lot of his mentoring happened in those.

He was instrumental – along with my University of Iowa Writers Workshop instructor, Richard Yates – in landing me my first agent, Knox Burger, famously the Gold Medal Books editor who revitalized John D. MacDonald’s career by getting him to create Travis McGee. Burger was a gruff, no-nonsense guy who was also Don’s agent – Don said of him, “Knox thinks tact is something you put on the teacher’s chair.”

I knew how heavily in debt to Don’s Parker my Nolan character was, and I had never intended Bait Money to be anything but a one-shot. In fact, Nolan died on the last page – he was designed to be, in a way, Parker at the age of fifty and old before his time, due to the harrowing life he led. So the book was meant to be a story about a tough guy’s last stand – the end of the Great American Hardboiled Anti-Hero.

Burger hated the ending, but I insisted on it, and he took the novel to half a dozen publishers, unsuccessfully. In those days, you had to submit a type-written manuscript on good bond paper – you couldn’t send a carbon, and anything with corrections (Liquid Paper included) was looked upon as amateur. Typewriter days for pro writers meant enduring a nightmare of making small revisions that required retyping pages, chapters and even books.

The sixth or seventh publisher spilled coffee on the manuscript. Burger said, “Since you have to retype it before I send it out again, change the ending. Let the guy live. Have the kid accomplice come back and save him.” I did just that and Bait Money sold next time out.

The publisher (Curtis Books) asked for a series – offered a five-book contract. I called Don and said, “Are you okay with this? Once is homage, twice is grand larceny.” He couldn’t have been more gracious. He said Nolan was a much more human character than Parker, made so by the presence of the younger character, Jon. There was a kind of father-and-son relationship (a recurring theme of mine). Also I had (as a college student in the late ‘60s) included things that hadn’t been in many, perhaps any, mystery novels yet – specifically hippies, the drug culture, and Beatles-era rock ‘n’ roll.

So, with Don’s blessing, I went ahead. It was my first series, and I thought I’d shut it down with the rather epic Spree, and am rather amazed I was talking into doing another not long ago for Hard Case Crime, Skim Deep. The same thing sort of happened with Don, who lost interest in Parker and shut him down with the expansive Butcher’s Moon, then returned almost twenty-five years later with Comeback.

4) You’ve referred to Mr. Westlake as a mentor. How did you first get in touch?

My first fan letter went out, effusive but fairly literate; he replied by return mail. Receiving that letter was one of the great events of my life. We had a long correspondence, lasting into the 1990’s.

One afternoon I got a call from Don – we knew each other well by now, via letters, but I think this was the first time we spoke. I live in Muscatine, a little Iowa river town on the Mississippi. So the last thing I expected was to get a phone call from Donald E. Westlake saying he and his wife Abby were in Muscatine. I do not remember why, just that they were on their way somewhere and, without telling me, he had detoured to swing by. Did I want to get together?

Was he kidding?

My parents were out of town, so we put the Westlakes up there, and Barb and I ordered food from our favorite Italian restaurant and fed our new friends. It was a lovely, lovely evening. Don and I talked movies mostly, which had been what much of our correspondence was about.

That may have been when I learned Don didn’t always go to the movies made from his books. If he didn’t like the script, or other aspects of a production bothered him, he just stayed home. He did like Point Blank, however, though he thought the script was weak but the direction strong.

I can’t imagine a universe where I would not want to go to a movie made from one of my books.

5) One of our favorite anecdotes about Mr. Westlake comes from Charles Ardai, who told us he was exactly like he’d expected a writer of comic capers to be right up until he observed what he defined as a Richard Stark moment — “it was like sitting down to a hand of cards opposite a professional poker player – you just know instantly how far out of your league you are.” Did you ever experience anything like that?

No. I am ridiculously self-confident.

Don and I never had a falling out, but there was a point where I became enough of an established writer to not need, or desire, mentoring. He knew about my big project, the historical detective novel, True Detective. He told me 100,000 words for a private eye novel was not practical. He also advised making Nate Heller a reporter, not a P.I. (He was no fan of private eye novels). He read the book in manuscript and had problems with it. While I took some of his advice, but not much, that marked an end to a certain aspect of our relationship. Later he gave me a blurb for True Detective, claiming he did so because I had fixed it (again, I hadn’t followed many of his suggestions). True Detective was the Private Eye Writers of America “Best Novel” Shamus winner for 1984, and I have continued to write Heller throughout my career – there are 19 novels.

By the way, Don said Westlake became Stark when he woke up and it was raining.

6) I recently read Transylvania Station, which is about the mystery weekends the Westlakes would host at Mohonk Mountain House, and you were mentioned as being one of the guests/speakers. Can you tell us a little bit about that?

I was privileged to be the murderer in one of those mystery weekend games. It was a wonderful experience. We met a number of well-known (Joe Gores) or on-the-rise (Harlan Coben) mystery writers; and the atmosphere, and food, were a summer-camp delight in the winter. Don put together program of movies for the evenings, including the 1931 film of The Maltese Falcon, which I’d never seen before. He was a defender of that much dismissed first version.

I agreed with him (still do), though we both knew the John Huston version was the masterpiece. We discovered we’d both, at some point, followed the Bogart movie along in the book. It’s that faithful. And now I’ve written a sequel called Return of the Maltese Falcon, coming out from Hard Case Crime on January 6 (I’m allowed one plug, aren’t?). Don was definitely a Hammett man, not a Chandler acolyte, and he saw merit in Mickey Spillane, but was not a huge fan.

I wrote a mystery novel, Nice Weekend for a Murder (1986), about the Mohunk experience. I split Richard Stark and Donald E. Westlake into two characters, one of whom was the murderer (turnabout being fair play).

You mention Hard Case Crime, who have published many of my novels, in particular the Quarry series. Don had sent me a novel about a Bob Hope-type performer who was kidnapped. It was bylined Westlake but wasn’t humorous, which seemed to be the problem editors had with it. He hadn’t had any luck with it, and sent it to me, saying if I cared to, I could do a fresh pass and we’d co-byline it and “split anything” we hauled to shore. I was preparing to start the rewrite when Don called and said, “Stop! This new Scorcese movie, The King of Comedy, beat us to the punch – makes the book impossible to market.”

So I shoved the book in a drawer. But after Don’s passing, a few unpublished novel manuscripts emerged and Charles Ardai at Hard Case Crime was publishing them. I told him about the Bob Hope-type book and he wanted to see it. He published it as The Comedy Is Finished. A tiny bit of my writing is still in there – the final paragraph I believe, which I’d shown to Don and he approved of.

I am happy to have that novel out there, and complimented beyond words that Don turned to me. That we might have had a genuine collaboration is a huge missed opportunity.

Toward the unanticipated early end of his life, we had grown apart somewhat. The last time I saw him, and that we spent time together, was when the British Film Institute brought us in to showcase John Boorman’s Point Blank and Sam Mendes’ Road to Perdition. I have a vivid memory of a small moment that I perhaps overplay in my mind. In an upscale British restaurant, we were seated at a table for perhaps six or eight, our hosts and our wives and ourselves. From down the table, Don noticed me being questioned earnestly, being taken very seriously, by some fairly erudite “chaps” and I had a sense he was thinking, There’s that kid I knew who actually grew up to be a writer. My last moment with him was when, as we walked out, I fell in with him and told him how much his support and friendship meant to me. He was shy about receiving such compliments, but he smiled and thanked me.

My last contact with him was by e-mail, when I wrote him about the latest of his new batch of Parker novels and told him how terrific it was, and that it reminded me of how much impact he and his character Parker had on me and my work. He wrote me back warmly, really appreciating my words of praise, and expressing a human lack of confidence in whether he “still had his fast ball.” He sure did.

7) As both a crime fiction author and comic book writer whose work has been adapted for the screen, do you have a favorite Parker adaptation? Have you read Darwyn Cooke’s graphic novel adaptations?

Point Blank remains the best film from Don’s work. He would write such great premises that Hollywood would be attracted to the set-ups, then ignore the rest of the great book. Bank Shot, anyone?

Before I touch upon the graphic novel adaptations by Cooke, I should discuss a few comics-related things about Don and me. When we corresponded, and he learned I was a comics fan (not yet a writer of comics), we sent things back and forth. I showed him Richard Corben’s Den, for example, and various underground comix, and he loaned me Harvey Kurtzman’s rare, ill-fated Trump (Hugh Hefner’s attempt to do a comics-oriented slick magazine – ran two issues). So Don was hip to comics. He gave me a blurb for my graphic novel Road to Perdition, which he seemed to like. When the movie came out, and got lots of press and praise, he called to congratulate me on “riding the Zeitgeist.”

Calls from him were rare but a treat. Once when a New York Times review of a Heller short story collection included an introduction making it sound like I had passed away, Don called, and when I answered, he said, “Good! You’re alive.” And hung up.

When I landed the job as the writer of the DICK TRACY comic strip – my first big break – Don and his wife Abby invited Barb and me to stay on a whole floor of their apartment while we were in NYC for an event related to my being signed by the Chicago Tribune Syndicate. They threw a cocktail party for us and invited publishing friends to meet and congratulate me. Among the attendees were Otto Penzler, Martin Cruz Smith, and Lawrence Block. Obviously this was an incredibly gracious kindness.

After I became an established comics writer, we talked seriously about me doing Parker graphic novels, but the publisher wanted originals and Don would only allow adaptations. So that fell through.

Now here comes the awkward part.

I don’t like Darwyn Cooke’s Parker adaptations. Cooke was a terrific artist, but his cartoony take on Parker strikes me as wrong. Something more “real,” frankly like Road to Perdition’s artist Richard Piers Rayner might have provided, would have been more appropriate. Or something grittier like Joe Kubert.

Don’t get me wrong. Both Westlake and Cooke were geniuses, gone much too soon. I just – personally – don’t think they made a good fit. But anyone who enjoys them, great.

8) In a January 2009 tribute to Mr. Westlake for The Rap Sheet, you wrote that there are several references to your work in Parker and Dortmunder. Are there any in particular that stand out?

I don’t recall any, just that Don would do that now and then. I think Butcher’s Moon might have included me in a dedication to several of his friends. And I know, a couple of times, when he needed to name somebody who was just an off-stage spear carrier or something, he’d use my name in part or in whole.

That’s a disappointing answer, so I’ll end with something better.

When we did the Mohunk mystery weekend, Don had me do a presentation about Dick Tracy, which was my calling card at the time. He introduced me, cheekily, as having written a series of novels (Nolan, obviously) that made me the Jayne Mansfield to his Marilyn Monroe. When I got to the microphone, I said, “I consider myself more Don’s Mamie Van Doren.”

He loved that.

I am pleased, even thrilled, when a Richard Stark fan likes the Nolan novels. I told Don once that the Nolans were the methadone to his heroin. But there’s only one Parker.

* * *

Here’s a terrific piece on the 10 smartest noir detectives – Mike Hammer in Kiss Me Deadly is on there, with a mention of me.

Hey Kids! It’s Book Giveaway Time

Tuesday, September 30th, 2025

We’ve not had a book giveaway here at the Update for some time, and I’m about to remedy that.

Last year Hard Case Crime reissued The Last Quarry in trade paperback form (with some bonus material in back, two of the three Quarry short stories from the ‘80s). Now HCC is taking the same trade paperback approach with The First Quarry (minus the bonus short stories).

What makes these reissues notable?

Well, the first three Quarry novels Hard Case Crime published (The Last Quarry, The First Quarry and Quarry in the Middle) appeared in the smaller original mass-market paperback size. This is for all of you who like to shelve your titles together – whether you are OCD or just particular – and would prefer your row of Quarry novels be all of the same format/size. Now you we no longer have to suffer with the indignity of the first three novels not lining up perfectly with the rest! Even the first four novels, as originally published by Berkley Books, were originally in mass market size. The fifth, Primary Target, re-titled Quarry’s Vote at HCC, was in hardcover and then a mass-market-sized paperback. All five are now HCC trade paperbacks.

I believe, though I am not absolutely certain, that Quarry in the Middle will also receive a trade paperback edition from Hard Case Crime, next year.

So, even if you have the original edition of The First Quarry, you are welcome to participate in this book giveaway. It works like this: e-mail me requesting the book at macphilms@hotmail.com. Even if you’ve won a title in a previous giveaway of mine, you must include your snail-mail address. Though no strings are attached, it would be nice if you’d review the book at the Amazon and/or Barnes & Noble sites, or your own blog, if you have one. The offer is open to US residents only, due to shipping costs.

[All copies have been claimed! Thank you for your support. –Nate]



I’ve talked about this before, but just in case you didn’t hear it from me, on an Update or otherwise, here’s why The Last Quarry was not the last Quarry, and why The First Quarry is not the first Quarry.

When Hard Case Crime got started, editor Charles Ardai approached me about reprinting Blood Money, the second book in my Nolan series (the first being Bait Money). I requested he collect both books in one volume, asking for no extra money, as I thought it awkward to start with the sequel to a long-out-of-print book, which Bait Money was at the time. He agreed and you can now get those books together as Two for the Money.

The Nolans did well enough for Charles to request I do another in the series. I said I’d prefer to do a Quarry novel. The series had something of a cult following (of course, as Donald E. Westlake said, a cult author is seven readers short of making a living) and I’d always felt the character should have put me on the map, which it hadn’t. The series was in fact dropped by Berkley Books after those first four entries.

But I’d recently made (with director Jeffrey Goodman) a short film about Quarry, based on my short story “A Matter of Principal.” The film did well at festivals and was warmly received when screened at a Bouchercon.

For this reason, and my own affection for the character, I wrote The Last Quarry for HCC, telling Charles I was thrilled to be able to wrap the series up (as the title suggests). I’d also been promised a Robert McGinnis cover, which I got. (And I should note that The Last Quarry was based on my screenplay of the eventual film called The Last Lullaby. The final film differs somewhat from my novelization.)

Then the damnedest thing happened: The Last Quarry was a success, garnering good sales and terrific reviews.

CUT TO: Charles and I are standing in a buffet line at a subsequent Bouchercon when he says, “It’s too bad you ended the series with The Last Quarry.” And I say, “Why don’t I write The First Quarry?”

Thus began a long series of Quarry novels (I’m working on Quarry’s Reunion, the thirteenth for Hard Case Crime), novels that have earned several Shamus nominations from the Private Eye Writers of America and two Edgar noms from the MWA. And there was a one-season of a QUARRY TV series from HBO/Cinemax, focusing on Quarry’s origin.

Not bad for a busted mid-‘70s paperback series.

Most of the new novels have me exploring the premise of Quarry using the late Broker’s list to track assassins to their next target, and offering a service to that target: stopping the hit by killing the assassins and discovering who bought the kill contract. This is what was set up in Quarry’s List, the second of the original four novels.

Some of these subsequent novels, like The First Quarry, tell of contracts Quarry carried out prior to – it gets confusing now – the events of the first Quarry novel (originally published as The Broker, currently carrying my preferred title, Quarry). Among these contract-killer novels are Quarry’s Choice and Quarry in the Black.

Another sub-set in the series are the “old man” Quarry novels, where the character is roughly my age Quarry’s Blood, Quarry’s Return).

I run into potential readers wanting to know what order to read the books in. I always say, I didn’t write them in order, so why read them that way? I would prefer to point such readers to two particular favorites of mine, Quarry’s Choice and The Wrong Quarry.

Is there a difference between the first four (Quarry, Quarry’s List, Quarry’s Deal and Quarry’s Cut) and subsequent entries, including the one I’m working on now?

Yes. There is more humor – dark humor, but more – in the later books.

One reason I didn’t try to take the series elsewhere, when Berkley dropped it, was my feeling that each novel had to top the last in extreme violence. Why did I feel that way? It’s not because I’m a sadistic nincompoop. It’s because, structurally, the early books are about showing Quarry in the first chapter or so doing something terrible, then in subsequent chapters (the bulk of the book) getting the reader to kind of forget that and come to like Quarry and view him as a reasonable guy (and a point-of-view character you could take the ride with). Then, at the end, faced with a situation that an actual normal human would otherwise deal with, Quarry again does something terrible.

All of this grew out of my desire to, in my way, top the great Richard Stark (Don Westlake) Parker novels. I had already written the first five Nolan novels, which were frankly imitative of the Parker series. I instead wanted to show readers (like me) of “crook books” with protagonists who worked the left-hand side of the street just what kind of “heroes” we (me) were identifying with.

The Parker novels were heist yarns told in third-person, giving readers some distance between them and the criminal events. I decided to do, instead of a professional thief, a hired killer, and tell the stories in the first person – put the reader inside Quarry’s head, and ultimately confront readers with just who it’d been they were rooting for.

To some degree, this approach is inherent in the later Quarry novels, yes, but the dark humor (I think) leavens the often nasty events of the narratives. That frees me from sense that I need to top the last book with some truly awful thing that Quarry does at the finish (although even then, in the Mike Hammer tradition, he is removing a bad guy or two or three).

The original novel – The Broker AKA Quarry – has this ambivalence built in. In that novel – never intended to launch a series – hired killer Quarry, to save his own ass, must solve the murder he committed.

Now Quarry’s 50th anniversary is just ahead (2026). I’ll try not to disappoint with Quarry’s Return.

* * *

Here is a list from Collider of the 20 best comic book movies. Guess what’s number two?

M.A.C.