Posts Tagged ‘Reviews’

Fifty Years (More or Less) of Quarry

Tuesday, August 25th, 2026

Yes, I created my hitman character Quarry fifty years ago. The life he’s led since has been both violent and unexpected.

In the late ‘60s, I’d set my ambitions to be a private eye writer aside to follow the Richard Stark example and write Bait Money, in which the mono-named thief Nolan and his sidekick Jon had one criminal adventure that led somehow to a number more. Nolan was meant to be an homage to Stark (Donald E. Westlake) and his antihero Parker, a one-off; but the publisher wanted more, and Don Westlake gave his blessing, so off and running we went.

But from the start I wanted to come up with something of my own, even if it was bound to reflect the hardboiled likes of Richard Stark, Mickey Spillane, Dashiell Hammett, James M. Cain, Jim Thompson and Raymond Chandler. I’m fuzzy on whether I was, somewhere in my young psyche, wanting to write a novel that could lead to sequels.

I’ll say this: I never have believed in writing a novel consciously designed to do that. It’s too presumptuous and leads to bad decisions – I always have written one book at a time. And with Quarry (originally published under the unfortunate title The Broker) I left my hitman in an untenable position, one from which it was unlikely he might survive.

Of course he did anyway.

I’ve spoken of this before, but I wanted to get away from the Stark/Parker approach that included only other crooks getting killed – no civilians. And, in part because I already felt I had a knack for it, utilize my gift for first-person narration to write about a bad guy in his own voice. To me, much as I liked Stark’s Parker, the character and his world presented in third person gave the reader some protection.

I wanted to tear that wall down, to confront readers with just who they were identifying. Additionally, I wanted Quarry to be in many ways normal, so you could go for long stretches and not have to deal with who and what he really was. I wanted him to be good company. He was damaged goods, but in many ways was just like us.

Also, I knew I had to do something original (again, within the hardboiled spectrum) to really make my mark in my chosen field. The way Spade, Marlowe, Hammer, Bond had. And Quarry seemed just the ticket. Nobody had written that character before, not in the first person, anyway.

So some part of the young me felt I’d found the thing that would set me apart, and my mark would be made. Except…no. The four Quarry paperbacks I wrote for Berkley Books generated scant sales; yes, a few nice reviews and some fan mail, but…when the fourth book came and went, so did Quarry.

And Nathan Heller, with his historical approach and first-person narration, became how I really made at least some sort of mark in my chosen field.

Enough so that a publisher approached me about doing whatever novel I wanted to…and I took that opportunity to write a fifth Quarry, to see if I could jump-start the series. The novel was well received (Primary Target aka Quarry’s Vote) but no further novels immediately followed. A few short stories did, however, and one of them (“A Matter of Principal”) generated a short film.

From there, Quarry just kept coming. Editor Charles Ardai at Hard Case Crime, in the early days of that line, gave me the opportunity to wrap the series up with The Last Quarry. But somehow that led to The First Quarry, and now the novels number eighteen…and somehow he’s been around since 1976. Along the way there has been a movie I wrote plus a single season of a Quarry TV series.

Actually the character was created at the University of Iowa’s Writers Workshop around ‘72, but it took a while for me to finish the novel and get it sold.

In November the 50th anniversary Quarry novel will be published by Hard Case Crime: Quarry’s Reunion. Reviews have started to appear and they’ve been positive. Take a look at Publisher’s Weekly on the novel:


Trade Paperback: Bookshop Purchase Link Amazon Purchase Link Books-A-Million Purchase Link Barnes & Noble Purchase Link
E-Book: Bookshop Purchase Link
Quarry’s Reunion (Quarry #18)
Max Allan Collins. Hard Case Crime, $18.99 trade paper (224p) ISBN 978-1-83541-646-4

Aging ex–hit man Quarry is in fine form in the pulse-pounding sequel to Quarry’s Return from MWA Grand Master Collins. At 71, Quarry is trying to lead a tranquil life in Minnesota. He jumps into action when he’s approached by Jenny Means, an attractive 40-something who’s the spitting image of her mother, Mary Ann—Quarry’s high school sweetheart. Jenny, who’s recently experienced a series of strange accidents and been shot at, fears someone is out to kill her. The police have dismissed her worries, attributing the gunfire to random gang violence, but Quarry returns to his hometown of Fair View, Ohio, where Jenny lives, to investigate. He arrives just in time for his 50th high school reunion, and finds several people who might want Jenny dead. They include her half brother, Alex, who’ll benefit financially if she dies before him, and Quarry’s former classmate, Caldonia Jackson, who has a fraught history with Quarry and has become Alex’s mentor. As in other series entries, Collins complements the brisk, pulpy plot with plentiful sex scenes, resulting in a gritty adventure that lives up to series standards. Collins’s fans will be well pleased. (Nov.)

Well, I’m well-pleased, as PW can be tough, and I took a chance with this one, because it’s not a typical Quarry (if there is such a thing). I wanted to explore his past in a way I haven’t before, and I also wanted to do a traditional mystery with a noir approach – something I’ve done a few times, including with Quarry in Quarry’s Cut.

The novel will not be out till November, but I am planning to do a book giveaway in September. I’ll offer ten copies to readers willing to write Amazon reviews. Or if you have a blog and do reviews, and would like a copy, let me know at macphilms@hotmail.com. More about this later.

In the meantime, here’s a terrific write-up from writer Ron Fortier, a real pro:

QUARRY’S REUNION
By Max Allan Collins
Available 10 Nov. 2026
Hard Case Crime
217 pgs

Grand Master mystery writer Max Allan Collins has created a number of series during his long career. He’s given us professional thieves, historical private eyes, retired secret agents and a wonderful small town female sheriff among many others. All were brilliantly written, but we do have our favorites. Topping our list is the Quarry books that tell the story of a Vietnam veteran and his evolution into a contract killer. Why it remains our favorite is primarily because, like Collin’s deadly protagonist, we too are veterans of that Southeast Asian conflict and are now well past calling ourselves middle-age.

Collins allows his fictional character to age like the rest of us. With the past few entries in the series, it has been fun to watch a 70-year-old tough guy deal with new, and always dangerous situations. Never quite sure his body will respond to whatever threats he will encounter; Quarry has to rely on his experience and hard earned survival skills.

In this new story, he is summoned back to his home town of Fair View, Ohio, by his long ago high-school sweetheart, Mary Ann Kemper. After he had left home to join the US Marines, Mary Ann married Bobby Means, the son of the town’s wealthiest family. They had a beautiful daughter named Jenny. After the marriage ended in divorce, Bobby married another local girl, Suzanne Shaw, and together they had a son, Alex. Soon after, Suzanne followed Mary Ann’s history and left him. Despite the scandalous divorces, Bobby’s mother, Virginia Means, refused to abandon her grandchildren and set up a trust fund for them. When turning 50, both Jenny and Alex would receive half a million dollars.

Now, as each is nearing that particular birthday, Jenny is nearly killed in three separate incidents. The police believe them to be nothing by random events, but Mary Ann disagrees. Convinced someone is trying to kill her daughter, she reaches out to Quarry. How and why she does this would involve writing our own lengthy dissertation. Suffice it to say, our protagonist agrees to help her. All this occurs during the weekend of his 50th High School Reunion. Among his surviving classmates are several possible suspects with motives for wanting Jenny terminated.

Quarry’s Reunion is a fun read watching Collins juxtapose his mystery over the all too familiar nostalgic torture that these gatherings become. It offers us a rare glimpse into Quarry’s origins, his life and aspiration before the world turned upside down and he found himself lost in a jungle half a world away. Again, it was all too easy for this reviewer to nod time and again, as we share quite a few of the old soldiers’ memories. This Quarry is a different character, attesting to the reality that change is the only true constant. Thanks Max, for not being afraid to grow old with us.

M.A.C.

A Unique Take on Return of the Maltese Falcon

Tuesday, May 5th, 2026

I had a lovely and really interesting e-mail about Return of the Maltese Falcon I’d like to share with you…and the e-mail writer has given me permission to do so, including her review of the novel.

Dear Max Allan Collins,

You have earned yourself a new fan. I loved Return of the Maltese Falcon.

Several years ago, I convinced my local Big Read committee to adopt The Maltese Falcon for their community wide project. I was a teacher, and I wanted my students to love all genres of classic lit as much as I do. The closest thing we had to The Maltese Falcon in our curriculum was Edgar Allan Poe short stories. Those are great, but I wanted them to read something more modern, too.

My students studied the novel and then hosted a successful community event where they shared their Maltese Falcon-related research to the public in interactive presentations. That project continues to be one of my most favorite teaching moments.

Thank you for revisiting this fun story. I recently reviewed it on my Substack page. I hope you have time to check it out. It’s linked here.

Thanks again for all your stories.

Oh, one more thing. I watched your YouTube video and picked up several writing tips. You are an inspiration.

Deborah Linn McNemee
KeepingClassics.com

Now here is Deborah’s really unique take on my novel.

It’s 2026 and Sam Spade Needs Sensitivity Training
How Max Allan Collins Nails a Sexist Detective
in Return of the Maltese Falcon

Deborah Linn McNemee
Apr 27, 2026

Sam Spade is a sexist pig.

We know this, right? He’s been a sexist pig since 1939. A good mystery is timeless, but we all can agree a man like Spade should leave his sexist behavior in the past.

Or maybe not because earlier this year, MWA Grand Master Max Allan Collins brought him back, problematic attitude and all, in the much anticipated Return of the Maltese Falcon. Collins has earned the title of MWA Grandmaster from a lifetime of great writing, such as Road to Perdition, and his work on well-known series like Dick Tracy, Mickey Spillane’s Mike Hammer, and even the Batman comic book.

Sam Spade was originally brought to literary life by Dashell Hammett in the 1930 classic detective novel, The Maltese Falcon. Sam Spade became the template for all the cynical, hard-nosed detectives that came after him. As problematic as these womanizing anti-heroes are, the biggest problem of all is that we like them, especially Sam Spade.

I’ll give you a moment to gasp and fan your face. You know it’s true. Readers, and probably the general public, love a bad good guy, especially when paired with a femme fatale and a wisecracking secretary who calls him out.

But–and it’s a big but–today’s culture will cancel writers for creating these characters just to make ourselves feel righteous.

If I weren’t already salivating at the thought of a sequel to Dashiell Hammett’s The Maltese Falcon, I would have picked up Collins’ book simply out of cancel culture curiosity. How would Collins handle writing a womanizing, sexist character like Sam Spade and a setting like 1928 San Francisco for someone reading him in 2026?

I am an author of retellings, so I know the dilemma. In my current work in progress, I’m navigating one of Mark Twain’s characters, Joe. You know him with the proper adjective Injun placed in front. The retelling needs the character and his storyline. It definitely does not need the moniker. It’s not a name I would ever consider using. It would never pop into my author brain, but it’s in the original. It must be dealt with. It’s delicate work to honor the character and the writing and not insult my readers or myself.

So how does Collins deal with one hundred year old norms? Brilliantly. He nails the sexist detective. And he does it with the help of a woman.

Return of the Maltese Falcon starts two weeks after The Maltese Falcon ends. Brigid O’Shaughnessy and Joe Cairo are languishing in jail for murder, double-crossing, fraud, and a myriad of other shady behaviors. Sam Spade, with his blonde Satan-esque face, is seated at his desk, considering a Christmas tree standing where his former partner’s chair used to be. It was erected by Effie Perrine, his secretary, who enters on cue with her “thin tan woolen dress” clinging to her as her heels clack on the linoleum floor.

We’re barely off page one and the only femme who’s not fatale is already having her way with Sam Spade. He’s not crazy about the holiday decor, but, in some ways, he’s crazy about Effie Perrine, so the tree stays. He knows this and doesn’t fight it as lights and tinsel and ornaments show up throughout the book.

Collins doubles down on Perrine’s power by giving her the last dig in this opening repartee. Perrine introduces Spade to a new client, Miss Smith, saying, “‘You’ll like her…She’s female and young.’”

Okay, so we like Effie Perrine. She is spunky and smart and takes Spade’s machismo in stride. But what about Spade? How does Collins nail him? And why do we like it that he does?

Writers of retellings have the benefit of ready made descriptions. In a Cereal at Midnight YouTube interview, Collins explains that even though Sam Spade has made appearances in short stories and movie adaptations, none of those likenesses could be represented in The Return of the Maltese Falcon because those works aren’t in the public domain. So the blonde hair, the V-shaped facial features, and yellow-grey eyes all come from the original novel. Hammett describes Spade as looking “rather pleasantly like a blond satan”.

This blond Satan idea is the seed that grows into our bad good guy for whom we can’t help cheering. Traditionally, Satan is a red dude with black skin or red horns where hair should be. We don’t think of him as blonde. We certainly don’t think of him as pleasant. But these are Hammett’s words that Collins runs with. It’s as if Spade is the middle ground embodiment of the little angel on one shoulder and the little devil on the other.

That combination continues as Spade smirks and smiles and calls his secretary and every other babe in the story honey or sweetheart or rattle-brained angel. In the original, a frustrated Spade rubs his face into Effie Perrine’s hip for comfort and in the same conversation discusses how he won’t marry his dead partner’s wife just because he was hooking up with her before the poor son-of-a-gun died. Somehow, we don’t hate him for it. We scowl with Effie Perrine as Spade then walks out the door to visit Miss Wonderly for what will become more than strictly a business call, but we don’t hate him.

Throughout both novels, we watch with voyeuristic delight as Spade plays every girl he calls on. Most of them are much younger, but it still doesn’t seem to upset us. Even Collins’ 2026 audience won’t protest too much. Maybe that’s because those honey-sweetheart-angels answer their hotel room doors still damp from a shower, barely covered with thin, see-through negligees and look up at him with doughy eyes and pouting lips. They flaunt their feigned vulnerability because they are playing him right back.

The truth is that Hammett’s Brigid O’Shaughnessy and Collins’ Rhea Gutman and Corrine Wonderly don’t only bring the game to the party, they write the rules, too.

Before you come at me with a lecture on it’s always wrong for older, wiser men to take advantage of younger women, let me concur. It’s wrong. Always. In real life.

Fiction is another world. What we abhor in real life, we often excuse in fiction. It’s a tough pill to swallow, but swallow it we must because Sam Spade is not the only devil getting away with it. Think of James Bond. Think of Indiana Jones when he walks into Marion Ravenwood’s pub to be welcomed with a punch to the face. She adds a certain desperation to her voice. “I was a child,” she says, “I was in love.” He responds with a barely considered, “You knew what you were doing,” and she drops the subject. By the end of the scene, she’s partnering up with him, and by the end of the movie, they’re in love again.

And the crowd goes wild.

Collins is a bit smarter. In that same Cereal at Midnight interview, Collins makes the statement to never write down to your reader. Always assume they are smarter than you. He does not assume the reader will so easily forget and forgive Spade’s escapades, so he brings on women who deserve comeuppance way more than Marion Ravenwood ever does.

Collins also says that the mystery of his novel is not the Maltese Falcon. The mystery is Sam Spade, himself. Who is Sam Spade, really, and what’s he gonna do?

Even if the statue was Hammett’s MacGuffin first, and Spade was his mystery, Collins enacts the concept perfectly. In The Return of the Maltese Falcon, we also have the return of Sam Spade’s libido. He seduces not one, but two young women. Just like in The Maltese Falcon, the women and the reader think maybe he’s gone soft-hearted. Maybe he’s finally met the dame to crack his gumshoe code.

And who knows, maybe Sam Spade isn’t even sure he hasn’t it. In The Maltese Falcon Returns, there’s a point when Effie Perrine watches one of those young ladies walk away and shudders. “‘I was afraid I wouldn’t be able to help you after all, as close as she was to you.’”

“‘She was,’ Spade admit[s]. ‘Too close’”

The point is that Sam Spade does have a code. It might not work for everyone, but it works for him. He doesn’t carry a gun in case he’s tempted to use it. He basically tells it straight. He keeps his word. And he likes women. He especially likes women who think they can pull one over on him, but he never likes them well enough to let them. Smart ones like Effie Perrine who tell it straight, too…well, he more than likes them. He respects them.

And maybe that’s why we like him.

Ultimately, Sam Spade doesn’t get a pass without the women in his world. We don’t mind him blowing off Iva Archer because she’s awful. The femme fatales with all their aliases and alliances are even worse. Their codes make his code seem darn near gallant.

There is one woman, though, who is everyone’s saving grace, Effie Perrine. She’s so sharp, so witty, and so good that if she can see something redeemable in Sam Spade, the sexist pig, we can forgive ourselves for seeing it, too.

* * *

Barb and I have been slowed down these past three weeks by bronchitis. We initially thought we had a reaction to working in the dust and detritus encountered while getting our basement back in shape – the book area, what has been the band room since we moved in and now is more a rec room. We worked hard for days and did not wear masks, so we figured that was the problem.

But we gave what we had to Nate and his family up the street, so if we were contagious, it wasn’t the basement. Barb is about two days behind me, but she’s had it even worse. We both made Emergency Room and Urgent Care visits, and I had an unrelated episode repeating some of the crazy verbal difficulties I experienced back when I had my zany hospital stay (in which I hallucinated I was solving a murder).

We are both doing much better, but we tire easily. It seems bronchitis has a bad habit of holding on.

In the meantime, I’ve started writing the new Sam Spade novel and that seems to be the best medicine.

Speaking of which, here’s some nice Spade coverage from Jeff Pierce at Rap Sheet.

M.A.C.

Sam Spade News & A Fruitcake Near-Rave

Tuesday, April 28th, 2026

I’m pleased to announce I’ve signed with Hard Case Crime to do two more Sam Spade novels.

Launching a new Spade series wasn’t my intention in writing Return of the Maltese Falcon. I merely wanted to be out there first with a sequel to the classic original, now that it was in the public domain, and was presumptuous enough to think I could get it right.

As I’ve mentioned here, when I finished writing the book, and was pleased with it, my wife Barb warned me to brace myself – she said, Not everyone would like me appointing myself to a task that some might think ought never have been attempted. My thinking was, Somebody’s going to do this, and it might as well be me.

And I was surprised and pleased that the reactions were overwhelmingly favorable, generating some of my best reviews ever. A few naysayers weighed in, though were very much in the minority. Don’t get me wrong: I didn’t feel vindicated, I felt relieved.

Only when I saw how well Return of the Maltese Falcon was doing did I begin thinking about writing more Sam Spade. Spade is a character about whom Hammett might well have written another dozen or two novels, like Gardner with Perry Mason, Christie with Hercule Poirot or Rex Stout with Nero Wolfe. And of course Hammett, before turning his back on mystery writing, had written three Spade short stories, plus there’d been the popular Spade radio show with Howard Duff.

But what came to my mind was offering my publisher a trilogy, the first of which would be the already existing Return. I found it interesting to suggest two more Spade novels, each separated by ten years or so – to see what Spade was up to in the war years and then the McCarthy-era ‘50s (which obviously have resonance with Hammett’s life).

I wrote a fairly lengthy proposal and Hard Case Crime’s Charles Ardai, with support from parent company Titan’s Nick and Vivian Landau and my editor Andrew Sumner, responded favorably. I am now about to begin work on Prey for the Maltese Falcon, set in 1939.

In some ways it’s more challenging than Return, which gave me the luxury of working within the parameters of the original novel – its characters, its locations, its themes. Now Spade is ten years older, and the case I’ve constructed takes him all sorts of places that the original novel and my sequel didn’t.

Wish me luck.

* * *

The UK’s Guardian has an excellent essay on the resurgence of interest in the private eye. It includes a nice reference to Return and me.

* * *

I was surprised and pleased to discover that the Overly Honest Reviews site has posted a terrific Death by Fruitcake review that I’ve been granted permission to share with you.

RAVING REVIEW: One of the best types of mysteries doesn’t pretend to be bigger than it is. DEATH BY FRUITCAKE leans into its small-town setting, its contained stage environment, and its personality-driven storytelling without trying to inflate the stakes beyond what the story can support. That restraint ends up being one of its biggest advantages. It knows the scale it’s operating within and, instead of stretching, digs inward into character, tone, and timing.

The setup is simple in the best way. A dress rehearsal collapses into chaos when a notoriously difficult actress drops dead mid-performance, and suddenly everyone in the room becomes a suspect. That kind of confined, single-location mystery has been done countless times, but what makes this one click is the attention it pays to the personalities circling the event. This isn’t about elaborate plotting or intricate twists stacked on top of each other. It’s about letting the audience sit in a room full of people who all have a reason to hate the victim and watching the tension build from there.

Paula Sands carries much of the story as Vivian, and what stands out isn’t just her presence but the way the performance embraces a slightly heightened delivery without tipping into parody. There’s a stiffness to her line reading at times, but instead of breaking the illusion, it almost feeds into the character. Vivian feels like someone who sees herself as more composed and authoritative than she actually is, and that disconnect becomes part of the charm. It’s not polished conventionally, but it fits the world the film builds.

Alisabeth Von Presley brings a different kind of portrayal as Brandy, and the contrast between the two performances becomes one of the film’s strengths. Where Vivian leans toward control and presentation, Brandy feels more fluid, more aware of the absurdity around her. The moments where she interacts directly with the camera could have come off as distracting. They’re used sparingly enough that they add personality instead of pulling you out of the story. It gives the film an edge, a reminder that it’s in on its own tone without constantly pointing it out.

The supporting cast fills out the ensemble, keeping the suspect pool engaging. No one is pushed into satire, but everyone is just exaggerated enough to feel distinct. That balance is important in a story like this. If the characters blend into one another, the mystery loses its shape. Here, each interaction carries just enough tension or humor to keep things moving, even when the narrative slows.

The investigation expands in a way that feels intentionally relaxed, but there are stretches where it could have used a sharper sense of escalation. Conversations feel a bit repetitive at times, suspicions shift without always adding new information, and the momentum dips as a result. It never stalls completely, but there’s a version of this that trims some of that repetition and lands with a bit more impact.

There’s a lightness to the humor that doesn’t undercut the mystery, and a sense of familiarity that works in its favor rather than against it. It feels like a story that understands its audience, especially those drawn to mysteries where the intrigue matters but the experience is just as much about spending time with the characters. The jokes land more often than not, and when they don’t, they still feel in line with the world the film has created.

The single-location setting becomes a strength rather than a constraint, forcing the film to rely on blocking, performance, and dialogue rather than on visuals. There’s a stage-like quality to everything, which makes sense given the setting, and instead of fighting that, the film leans into it.

What ultimately holds everything together is the film’s understanding of what kind of mystery it wants to be. It’s not chasing complexity for its own sake, and it’s not trying to reinvent the genre. Instead, it focuses on delivering a contained, character-driven story with enough intrigue to keep you guessing and enough personality to keep you invested.

There’s also an underlying appreciation for the setting itself. The small-town dynamics, the overlapping relationships, the way grudges and histories linger just beneath the surface, all of that feeds into the mystery without needing to be spelled out. It gives the film a sense of place that adds texture without complicating the narrative.

DEATH BY FRUITCAKE doesn’t aim for perfection. Its appeal comes from how comfortably it settles into its identity. The imperfections are part of the experience, but they don’t define it. What sticks is the chemistry between its leads, the playful tone, and the steady commitment to telling a story that fits its scale. It’s the kind of film that understands exactly what it’s offering, and more importantly, what it isn’t. And in a genre that often overreaches or overcomplicates itself, that clarity goes a long way.

Please visit https://linktr.ee/overlyhonestr for more reviews.

* * *

If you haven’t read Return of the Maltese Falcon yet, please do. And if you watch Death by Fruitcake on Prime or Roku or Apple TV, please leave a thumbs up if you’ve enjoyed it. And if you order the DVD from Amazon, a favorable review there would also be helpful.

Finally, just a reminder that True Noir: The Assassination of Anton Cermak is out as a 4-CD set now, and can be ordered here for only $23.37 (on sale from its usual $35.95) [Also in a single-disc MP3-CD for $19.47 or digital download for a mere $12.97! – Nate] It’s a full-cast star-studded nearly five-hour audio drama written by me from the first Nate Heller novel, True Detective, and directed by my pal Robert Meyer Burnett.

M.A.C.

Alisabeth Von Presley, Eliot Ness and the Basement from Hell

Tuesday, April 7th, 2026

This from Alisabeth Von Presley on instragram:

You guys!!! The movie I filmed last year is officially OUT and I’m screaming.

Death By Fruitcake is finally here!! I play the daughter of a local theatre diva, and together we accidentally (and very fabulously) get wrapped up in solving a murder… don’t worry, it’s chaos in the cutest, funniest way possible

You can stream it on Amazon or grab your own copy (which, obviously, you should).

Directed by the incredible Max Allan Collins. Truly one of the most joyful humans to work with. I loved every second of this experience with him and the entire cast & crew!!

* * *

Here’s Tim DeForest on Bullet Proof:

Eliot Ness #3: Bullet Proof, by Max Allan is the third of Max Allan Collins’ excellent hard-boiled series set in the 1930s and featuring Eliot Ness. It’s set after Ness’s Untouchable days, when he worked as Safety Director in Cleveland, running both police and fire departments.

Collins’ novels are fictionalized versions of cases Ness actually worked. In this case, he’s looking into labor trouble. A couple of smart racketeers are entrenched in important union positions, using this to extort money out of local business owners.

Ness’ problem is getting enough of the victims to testify, since doing so could be dangerous to their health. In the meantime, Ness recruits an old friend who is involved in the unions to help gather evidence. The friend is an old union hand, but recognizes that the racketeers aren’t doing the working class any favors.

Eventually, the situation escalates from vandalism and extortion to murder. There’s an attempt to hit Ness as well, but the top cop comes up with a clever plan to gather supposedly lost ballistics evidence and soon finds himself stalking a killer through a warehouse filled with plate glass.

It is yet another great entry in this great series. The story progresses logically and Collins presents Ness as a strong, smart protagonist. Characterizations of both good guys and bad guys are excellent.

It’s available here in a $10.99 trade paperback.

There is also a four-book collection of all my Ness novels in Kindle e-book format.

And Wolfpack has 16 of my novels (some with Mickey Spillane) as well as other e-book collections. If you haven’t read the three John Sand novels (Matt Clemens and I paying tribute to James Bond), the two Mommy novels, the Blue Christmas collection (with the novella that is the source of the film), or my pre-Antiques series collaborations with my wife Barb, this is where you’ll find them: https://wolfpackpublishing.com/collections/max-allan-collins

* * *

As I await hearing from one of my regular publishers on a book proposal, Barb and I have gone into Extreme Spring Cleaning mode.

To say our basement – home to many books, magazines, comic books, DVDs and laserdiscs – was overdue for attention would be a ridiculous understatement.

The shelves in what should be a library have become overstuffed and random, where for years they had been reasonably well-organized. Much of my Nathan Heller and other historical research lives there, until recent years decently curated. Now what should be an array of wonderful reading material looks like the Yard Sale from Hell.

Barb and I have spent most of two weeks on the project of sorting and culling, boxing up books and DVDs and magazines and comics to go to Half-Price Books and Davenport’s Source Bookstore. I admit to prefering the latter, because Half-Price Books is Complete Highway Robbery; but when stuff has gotta go, it’s gotta go.

This has involved going into nooks and crannies where previous books, comics and mags have been subject to water damage. These go unceremoniously into the trash. Here’s the thing about going through sixty years of collecting: you face not just your own mortality, but that of physical objects.

Sorting correspondence has been rewarding, however, with letters turning up from Chester Gould, Mickey Spillane, Ross MacDonald, Brian Garfield and (a huge stash from) Donald E. Westlake. Less rewarding have been decisions about which runs of magazines to keep and which to get rid of.

The difference between hoarding and collecting, particularly if you don’t collect carefully, is a surprisingly small one. Rob Burnett keeps his DVDs and Blu-rays and 4K discs alphabetized, and I bet Terry Beatty knows where every collectible he owns can be found.

I have always been good about not going overboard with multiple editions. I do have various editions of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost (Hammett, Chandler, Spillane), but mostly I keep only one copy of any book I love. And deciding what to keep that doesn’t fall into the “love” category, say a book you liked, or a not particularly good book by a favorite author, well…that’s where Barb comes in. She snatches me from the jaws of insanity and pitches what questionable item I’m contemplating into oblivion.

And I have to say she’s incredible. For example. Barb has, from the start, never minded me buying men’s magazines. She’s been beautiful as long as I can remember (going back to my crush on her in the fifth grade), and her self-confidence has never been shaken by paper images. We have pin-up paintings all over the house and she likes most and tolerates the rest. When our son Nate was a little kid, his friends would look around wide-eyed and say, “Does your dad like girls?”

But how many women would patiently pile copies of Hustler and Penthouse into box after box to take to be sold to a book dealer for pennies, nickels and dimes? Few, if any other wives, would. She even insists on loading up our vehicle with boxes of books, mags and comics, not wanting me to risk my heart condition.

And it’s true that I can only work for a couple of hours before either taking a long break or hanging it up for the day. This kind of sorting requires a lot of up and down and reaching for this or bending for that, which is hard for a guy whose meds all come with dizziness and balance side issues. If just you’re starting to feel sorry for me, which I sincerely doubt, my most recent check-up showed that I am in incredibly good health for somebody with so much shit wrong with him.

I have known for a long time that my possessions come seriously close to owning me. Now I am finally getting even with them.

And even at this stage – past the half-way point – our basement lair is looking more like a library and less like a embarrassment.

M.A.C.