Go Go Gone

April 23rd, 2013 by Max Allan Collins

As predicted, Barb and I wrapped up the eighth “Trash ‘n’ Treasures” mystery, ANTIQUES A GO GO, last week. It took through Thursday to finish it – I always take a couple of days to go over a manuscript and do a final tweak before sending it off. Still seems strange not to be packaging up an actual manuscript and instead just sending an attachment to an editor.

The book is something of a change of pace, as it takes Brandy and her mother to Manhattan, but I won’t dwell on that book, since the new one – ANTIQUES CHOP – is about to come out. I think CHOP may be my favorite of the series (the new one is too fresh in my mind for any kind of judgment beyond, “Whew! Glad to get that outa here!”). For those of my readers fearful of trying a “cozy,” this one has axe murders in it. So put on a bib and dig in.

I’ve alluded to a Kickstarter project here that would take one of my Dreadtime Stories radio plays into low-budget feature-film territory. We had a lot of great things in our favor, among them the participation of Danielle from AMERICAN PICKERS, my longtime cinematic collaborator Phil Dingeldein (a d.p. on PICKERS), Malcolm McDowell as narrator, and of course the Fangoria brand-name. But at the very last minute (we were going to meet on Sunday afternoon, with my son Nate coming in from St. Louis for Kickstarter consulting), a different Fangoria deal interceded to make ours untenable. The good news is that Phil and I will likely be involved in some aspect of this new direction. I’m hopeful we can involve Danielle, too. We’d spent a lot of time (including me doing three or four drafts of “House of Blood” as a screenplay) gearing up for the Kickstarter effort with producer Carl Amari, so there’s disappointment in the mix, but also the promise of filmmaking to come.

Speaking of films, I can recommend OBLIVION, a very smart s-f adventure with Tom Cruise. The reviews are mixed on this one, but I am solidly in the plus column. The art direction alone is worthy of your attention, but the screenplay has some nice surprises, and it’s a well-directed film in general, though a big shoot-‘em gun battle seems out of place and maybe patched-in to satisfy studio execs.

This weekend my band Crusin’ played two nights in a row – a real oddity for us, because I try very hard to avoid that. It’s more like twice a month I’m after. And I will freely admit that on Sunday, I felt like I’d fallen down a flight of stairs (I’m writing this on Monday and feel only marginally better). I continue to enjoy the band, but sometimes it’s starting to feel like that moment in the action movies where the old star says, “I’m getting too old for this shit!” You know, right before a helicopter blows up?

This week I am looking at galley proofs of THE WRONG QUARRY and ASK NOT.

* * *

The three-part look at the Nolan series by Dan Luft over at the Violent World of Parker has wrapped up with a discussion mostly about SPREE. This is a nice series of articles, and with some smart commentary. Occasionally, though, Dan misses the mark fairly wide – he’s about the only reader I’ve ever encountered who disliked the use of the Comfort family in SPREE. He claims to really like the book, except for the Comforts, which is kind of like loving everything about JURASSIC PARK except the dinosaurs.

Here’s a really nice COMPLEX 90 review. Coming up soon, by the way!

This BLOOD MONEY review is basically positive, but it’s a little odd, albeit in an interesting way. It continues to be weird reading reviews of stuff I wrote forty years ago.

Here’s a very good TRUE DETECTIVE review. It’s amazing how resilient that book has been. Published thirty years ago, it sold more copies in the last year (e-book format) than in its first several.

Mel Odom, himself a hell of a writer, has some interesting things to say about BYE BYE, BABY, the first book in the Nathan Heller JFK Trilogy.

Finally, here’s yet another positive look at SEDUCTION OF THE INNOCENT (mine, not Wertham).

M.A.C.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Go Go Gone”

  1. dan luft says:

    I love dinosaurs! It’s Jeff Goldblum who scares me.

    Anyway, I realized reading your reaction that it may not be valid to review a series that was written over a 20-year span as if it were conceived as a single thing. Also, I realized that I’m not the binge reader I was in high school. I first read the Nolan books over a two year span in the 90s and the Comforts didn’t get to me then. But reading all the books in one summer kind of hardened me to when you borrowed from yourself.

    But I stick by my conclusion that your audience is primed for another Nolan heist.

  2. I really appreciate the attention you gave Nolan.

    My point about the Comforts is that you are the first Nolan fan not to like them that I ever ran into, and they are my favorite thing about the Nolan novels — I think I did them best in SPREE. Lyle and Cindy Lou (is that her name?) were especially favorites of mine, and I love the pettiness of the Comfort family crimes — that they stole from parking meters, that they stole food stamps. They are designed to be the id of Nolan and Jon — below the codes and niceties, all thieves are the Comforts.

    By the way, Cole Comfort was created in part so I could write the line that began “Cole Comfort’s farm,” since COLD COMFORT FARM is one of my favorite novels.

    The concept of a writer “borrowing” from himself is interesting. I don’t think of it as borrowing as much as operating in a world created for a given series. Binge-reading of a series is fun for a reader, but not necessarily a good way to read the novels in a series (contradictory though that may seem). Writers, as you indicate, do their novels over time. A binge-reader, ironically, is more familiar with the details of a series than the writer of that series is. We can’t go back and re-read everything before we write the next book (nor would I want to to if I had the time and energy for that). So we get things wrong. Or anyway, we are inconsistent (I think Quarry may be an Army vet in some novels and a Marine vet in others — I’m not sure). We may repeat ourselves unknowingly (as opposed to borrowing). My mind is a closet and I reach for things on shelves and hangers — things I’ve worn or used before. It’s gonna happen, and it’s not necessarily bad, because it creates a world for a series, and a thematic unity for a writer.

  3. col says:

    Hiya – Mr basically positive (albeit interestingly but odd) here.
    Hopefully I enjoy them a bit more as I progress through the series.
    I liked it enough to want to read more, but I wouldn’t pretend it’s a book that rocked my world. So yeah, basically positive, and I’m looking forward to more, cheers Col

  4. Just thought you had an interesting point of view — acknowledging that a book didn’t have to blow you away before you considered reading another by that author (or in that series).

    The Nolan books in my opinion do get progressively better. BLOOD MONEY was one of my earliest novels, after all. I do not put Nolan on a level with Quarry and Heller, which is why (despite some sentiments expressed here) it’s unlikely I’ll ever get around to doing another. Of course, that’s in part because SPREE (the last of the novels do dat) feels like a conclusion.